Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
  • Categories
    • Art
    • Fashion
    • News & Politics
    • Photography
    • Tech
      • Computers and Internet
      • Video Games
  • Twitter
  • Magpile

Stuff On Paper

Magazines (mostly), and why I like them (or don't).

Computer Shopper: Not vengeance. Punishment.

Computer Shopper, November 1989

“Computer Shopper”, says Alexis C. Madrigal of The Atlantic, “was like Vogue or Vanity Fair for nerds: You read it for the ads.” Which is what 99% of the magazine was. It was a massive tome filled with ads of companies selling their computers and peripherals, along with some articles on this or that tech stuff that I didn’t read back then and won’t be reading now.

But let me backtrack for just a moment.

A lot of my time spent for this blog thus far has been looking through old magazines from my youth. Often I’ll notice things now I didn’t give a second thought about then, or see things in a totally different way. As a kid I loved flipping through computer catalogs (and CS was essentially that), wishing I had this or that shiny new system. Looking at this November, 1989 issue of CS again (that I held onto for some inexplicable reason other than to write this post twenty-six years later) has revealed to me something I’m sure I didn’t notice before, or had since put out of my memory.

The ads.

They’re bad. Like, really bad.

It’s the puns! There are just so many of them! It’s like a boy pun got together with a girl pun and had a million pun babies, quickly infesting the hapless ads therein. I don’t remember if I ever bought other issues of CS or not, but I’m guessing they were similar.

Of course puns in copy or visuals can be a good way to grab people’s attention, and there are plenty examples of puns used in clever ways in advertising.

These are not them.

So let’s look at some bad puns in old computer ads, shall we?

Get ready, kids. There are a lot of bad jokes ahead.
***

“OUR EPSON PRINTER PRICES ARE OUT OF THIS WORLD!!”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

Let’s kick off this list with one of the most basic, overused advertising puns ever, the “out of this world” pun.

This ad makes me want to reach for the stars… grab one, and shove that flaming ball of gas into my eyes.
***

“THIS IS NO SNOW JOB”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

Snow job? This ad needs a whack job.
***

“IMMEDIATE CACHE BENEFITS.”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

Robert “Dinero” would love this ad.

(They just get better and better, don’t they?)
***

“Under-Ware Electronics: Hitting prices below the belt for over 15 years”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

:(
***

“We Trump the Competition with On-site Service!”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I’m not sure why, but this one really annoys me. Each ad here is trampling over the limits of good-punism of course, but here, if you covered up everything but the headline and the card, you’d have no idea they’re talking about computer service. It more suggests service for your new GE-branded stack of playing cards. The “snow job” ad fails in the same way, but it doesn’t irritate me as much. Probably because the snow man looks happy even though he has no reason to be there, the poor ignorant fool.

Either way, I think this ad is a real ace in the hole… the craphole, that is.
***

“Do we have the best selection of Computer Books and at great Discount Prices? You bet your sweet ASCII we do!”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I could never buy something from Mr. Computer Books. He’s way too cheeky for me.
***

“One Small Step Toward Computer Satisfaction One Giant Leap For Computer Performance”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I want to take one giant leap… off of a short pier. (Mixing puns with cliches. I feel like I’ve made it as a writer now.)
***

“IT DESERVES A CITATION.”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I don’t think I’ve mentioned it before, but I’m a bit of a grammar and spelling nazi (so if anyone notices any mistakes I make, let me know so I can correct them—seriously, I can take it!).

But something else that irks me a little is language usage that isn’t necessarily incorrect, but just sounds weird. Like the sign here:

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I suppose “SPEED” isn’t technically incorrect, depending on how you mean it (“This isn’t just a computer; it’s a SPEED computer!”). And the first sentence in the body copy:

“Even though our 386-25 is built around a true Intel 25Mhz CPU, not a revved up slower chip, it’s still frequently cited for speed.”

First of all, speeding, please and thank you, although again I guess it’s not technically wrong. Second of all, this sentence makes no sense at all! Think about it. Wouldn’t this overly-zippy computer be given a speeding ticket because it’s “a true Intel 25Mhz CPU” (i.e. implying this is a fast chip for the time, with emphasis added), not in spite of it (implied by the “even though”)? Or maybe there’s something about “revved up slower chips” I don’t know that makes them faster than something that’s a slightly faster clock speed. I don’t know. These are the things that keep me up at night.

Officers, arrest this speed computer ad. Not for being fast, but for being dumb.

That’s all I got for this one. :/
***

All these Swan Technologies ads

“Our Swans make waves.”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

“The Swan 386SX. The wave of the future…”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

But wait! There’s more! Check out the subheadings…

“Swan will make you wave goodbye to other computer dealers.”

“Swan Peripherals add unwavering value and performance to your PC.”

Jackpot! Word and visual puns! Clearly it’s our lucky day. But Swan isn’t done yet, oh no! Photography aside (which I really don’t mind and actually kind of like), there’s this wonderful illustration of a PC riding a wave.

Computer Shopper, November 1989

I just can’t think of it in terms of a pun; all I can think of is a tsunami is heading to shore carrying a giant computer as people on the beach look on in terror. Probably not what Swan was going for.

Oh my! What’s this?! I do believe we have another Swan Technologies ad!

“Make a mating call. 1-800-468-9044″

Computer Shopper, November 1989

From the body copy:

“Call our toll-free number and our expert staff will mate you with hardware, software, or peripherals to fit your unique needs.”

“Mate” you? Ew. You know what’s even more ew? When you add unnecessary quotation marks.

“Call our toll-free number and our expert staff will mate you with hardware, software, or peripherals to fit your ‘unique needs’.”

Extra ew, amiright? (Yes, this is how I have fun.)

But according to them, “when you shop Swan, you’ll get the benefits of a strong, supportive relationship”, so at least it sounds like they want more than a one-night stand.

But you know what, Swan Technologies? I think I’m going to have to wave goodbye to this relationship. It’s not you; it’s this town! I want to make waves in the big city! I want to swan dive right into things, make a name for myself. You know, make a big splash! I promise I’ll call you. (I won’t call you.)

And now, my personal favorite…
***

“All systems are tested by the Rose Hill Lab.”

Computer Shopper, November 1989

No, not there. First paragraph, second page:

Computer Shopper, November 1989

This poor, well-dressed dog must have eaten some trash the neighbors threw over the fence, because he clearly suffers from a vicious case of pun diarrhea.

What was/were the copywriter(s) thinking with this one? More pun = more clever? It makes me want to take it into the back yard and put it down…

Know what else is at the end of it’s life? This post. Not like the frogs that don’t have their vocal cords. You know, the ones that can’t croak? Yeah, those.

Thank you, I’m here all night! No seriously. Where I’m typing this? I live here.

Bye.

Wednesday, August 5, 2015 stuffonpaper Permalink Leave a response Computers and Internet, Computer Shopper

On Sharknadoes and Friendship

TV Guide Magazine featuring Sharknado 3

I never bothered to watch Sharknado when it first aired. My reaction when I first heard about it was a big WTF, and I dismissed it as just another dumb direct-to-TV/video flick. Same went for Sharknado 2: The Second One.

I did appreciate the titles on some level though, just because of their ridiculousness. Thing is, 10-15 years ago, those ridiculous titles alone would’ve been enough to get me to watch them, because back then I loved watching crappy movies, most of them being horror films. Yeah, the Sharknado films are really more, uh, natural disaster flicks I guess, but if there’s somebody getting maimed for whatever reason, it qualified for me.

And yet…

As I watched those B-grade poo piles, I never was fully enjoying myself. I mean I wasn’t a total idiot; I knew they were bad; I had just convinced myself they were so bad they’re good. But there can be a very fine line between movies-so-bad-they’re-good and bad-movies-that-are-bad-just-because-they’re-bad. Back then I walked all over that line. I convinced myself there wasn’t one.

And so I continued to watch them. I remember thinking why other people weren’t watching the movies I was. “There’s joy to be found here!” I said. “Camp Not Crap” was my rallying cry. No, 20-ish year-old Sam. You weren’t watching a bad movie that was fun to watch. You were just watching a bad movie. It took an intervention for me to realize that. But I’ll get to that in a second.

So, throwing logic to the marine-animal-tossing wind (caution and better judgement sucked up along with it), I thought “Fuck it. I’ll give Sharknado a try.” Would there be joy to be found in its supposed satirical tomfoolery? Or will it just suck like the sharknadoes themselves? I sat down with my dinner (so at least I wouldn’t totally be wasting my time), turned on Netflix, and…

Eh… well, it was bad. No surprise there. BUT, it was obvious that director Anthony Ferrante and crew knew exactly the kind of movie they were making, and I can appreciate that. I probably wouldn’t watch it again, though. If anything, it wasn’t quite campy enough for me throughout the whole movie. (The last twenty minutes were amazing, though!) Killer Klowns From Outer Space? They Live? The Toxic Avenger? Now THAT’S good camp right there.

But this is where the intervention comes in. If anything, Sharknado made me think back to all those times years ago when I would watch movies I knew were of questionable quality and taste, so there was a bizarre feeling of nostalgia for me as I watched it. Not a longing for bygone days, but a happiness that my movie watching palate has since shifted its tastes.

That change happened because of a good friend of mine whom I first met about nine years ago. Any semblance of good taste I have—and the ability to tell the difference between good-bad and bad-bad—I owe it to her.

I finally realized the lie I was telling myself all those years. She introduced me to The Shining, for example, now one of my favorite horror films of all time, which I never bothered to watch until then. Why? Because my schedule was too full with the likes of Trailer Park of Terror.

Sometimes, bad movies are just bad. Or at the very least, not very good. I finally accepted that. The last nine years of my movie-watching life have been a lot more enjoyable than those before.

Sure, everyone’s going to have their own tastes. One man’s trash(y movie) is another man’s treasure, after all. But if you find yourself watching a movie that you think you like, but leaves you feeling less than satisfied or worse, maybe even reaching for another bad movie to fill the void, you may just have the same problem I did. Get help now. Tell a friend. It’s never too late!

I haven’t seen the second Sharknado yet, and I missed the first airing of the third one, (affectionately and aptly subtitled Oh Hell No!) on Syfy on the 22nd, but what the hell (see what I did there?), I’ll probably watch those too at some point. Yes, I still do knowingly make poor choices sometimes, but at least now I don’t try to tell myself I’m not making them!

Other than musing on bad movies and good friends, one thing I actually wanted to mention about the TV Guide Magazine article itself (that really doesn’t have much to do with Sharknado): I had no idea Bo Derek was a photographer. She shot the cover and interior photos for the article. I found a few other examples of her work online, but no portfolio or anything like that. Anyway, from the little I saw, she’s good!

Also, as an aside, if you want to experience one of those really bad horror flicks from my younger days, hailing straight from my hometown area no less, check out Night of the Snakehead Fish. I’m lucky (!) enough to own this one on DVD, but the whole thing is on YouTube (the audio gets out of sync though, which makes it even harder to watch). This one I’d say is 98% bad-bad with a few good-bad moments. Please don’t hunt me down if you actually watch it.

Thursday, July 30, 2015 stuffonpaper Permalink Leave a response Topics & Tangents, TV, TV Guide Magazine

Holy Crap Check Out These RockCards

I found these little gems in a dark corner of my old room at my parents’ place that apparently lay undisturbed since 1991.

Rockcards Front

Back in the early- to mid-nineties I was big into trading cards, albeit mostly fantasy stuff (think Boris Vallejo and Julie Bell). I was also a metalhead, so I guess it makes sense that I’d buy something like this?

Were these actually collectible? Were there guys (or girls) getting together to trade these things? “Johnny, I’ll trade you a Boston for an Air Supply!” “Okay, Lisa!” (Which is a horrible trade, by the way—don’t ever do that!) I know all the bands repped here except for Dan Reed Network and Junkyard, and I don’t care to look them up. Whitesnake though… yeah, they were totally my jam back in the day. That’s probably why Tommy Aldridge is in the middle of the page.

Tommy Aldridge, the forlorn poodle of hard rock.

Tommy Aldridge, the forlorn poodle of hard rock.

Remember Whitesnake’s self-titled album in ’87? It was frickin’ awesome! And by the way, thanks for jumpstarting puberty for me, Tawny Kitaen.

Anyway, RockCards. I love the list of stats on the backs of these things.

Rockcards Back

Where else are you going to learn Bryan Baker collects Coca-Cola memorabilia? Makes me wish they took it further and listed things like “Favorite Guitar Strings” or “Favorite Sunglasses to Wear Indoors” or a rating on a “Hair Fluffiness” scale. I think Jeff Labar is winning the ranking on that one. I like to think I would’ve placed respectably on that scale at one time, too. *sigh*

Thanks for the bittersweet memories, RockCards. I wonder if there are anymore time capsules hiding in my room…

Friday, July 3, 2015 stuffonpaper Permalink Leave a response Can we just talk about this for a minute?, Rockcards, trading cards
← Previous 1 2 3 … 6 Next →

Search

Copyright © 2025 Stuff On Paper.

Powered by WordPress and Cascade.